ANTI-MUSLIM RECORD OF MODI
"Ultimately the wicked world order regards the blood of Muslims to be worthless."
Narendra Modi is the very same terrorist who led the Hinadak gangs’ destruction of the historic Babri Mosque in the city of Ayodhya in 1992, constructing a Hindu temple on its ruins.
"Recently CNN concluded its news report on the new Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, describing him as “anti-Muslim”"
Modi was actually barred from entering the United States from 2005-2014 (until now) due to the charges held against him for his crimes and atrocities against the Muslims of his own nation; crimes which CNN and most major Western media outlets have argued were sanctioned by the state as Muslims were turned into refugees in their own homes."
|
The rise and rise of Narendra Modi Rakesh Chandra New Delhi, September 13, 2013 | UPDATED 11:41 IST
Born
in September, 1950 at Vadnagar, a small town in Mehsana district of North
Gujarat, Shri Narendra Modi grew up in a culture that instilled in him the
values of generosity, benevolence and social service. During the India-Pak
war in the mid sixties, even as a young boy, he volunteered to serve the
soldiers in transit at railway stations. In 1967, he served the flood
affected people of Gujarat. Endowed with excellent organisational
capability and a rich insight into human psychology, he served in Akhil
Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) and played a prominent role in various
socio-political movements in Gujarat.
|
Posted by: Ahmad Chaker Jomaa
(Translated from Arabic)
According to a statement issued by the U.S. State Department on May 16th 2014, the United States has welcomed the success of the new
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, stating that U.S President Barack Obama will work to establish close communication with him when he composes his government and assumes the responsibilities of his office.
[1] The US will work with the formed parliament and strengthen bilateral relations between the two countries.
[2]
Recently CNN concluded its news report on the new Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, describing him as “anti-Muslim”
[3] being the leader of one of the most malicious Hindu extremist groups. In the seventies Modi emerged as a supporter of the ‘Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh’ or RSS, a right wing Hindu social movement.
[4] In 1988, the RSS party transferred Modi to the ‘Bharatiya Janata Party’ or BJP and Modi assumed Secretary-General of BJP in the city of Gujarat. In 2001 Modi was elected as Chief Minister of Gujarat.
[5] Riots broke out in the following year between Hindus and Muslims in the city, claiming the lives of over a thousand people, most of whom were Muslims. Modi was severely criticised and accused of neglecting his duty of halting the riots. However, following an investigation in 2013, the High Court of Justice declared him innocent of all charges.
French newspaper ‘Le Nouvel Observateur’ is seldom considered partial in favour of Islam or Muslims. Nonetheless, following an on-the-ground investigation it documented Modi’s crimes (‘the Ascension of Terrible Modi’).
[6] Regrettably, some in the West—as we can expect—only pay heed to reports that suit their whims and more than often fail to recognise accounts that do not serve their hostility towards Islam and Muslims. While he may have shed crocodile tears over the riots, Modi refuses to utter a single word of apology for the brutality that transpired, while meanwhile commentators confirm that “Modi represents death to Muslims.”
Narendra Modi is the very same terrorist who led the Hinadak gangs’ destruction of the historic Babri Mosque in the city of Ayodhya in 1992, constructing a Hindu temple on its ruins.
[7]
The twisted irony is that a man with such a disgraceful record is being welcomed so eagerly by the biggest peddles of ‘democracy’ in the world. This is in spite of the fact that Modi was actually barred from entering the United States from 2005-2014 (until now) due to the charges held against him for his crimes and atrocities against the Muslims of his own nation; crimes which CNN and most major Western media outlets have argued were sanctioned by the state as Muslims were turned into refugees in their own homes.
The West’s position has turned on its head, with Obama extending an invitation to this criminal to visit the US even before he officially took office, instructing his ambassador to India to congratulate Modi immediately after the results were announced.
Strangely enough people celebrate the victory of a man who possesses the ‘necessary qualifications’ of hatred against Islam and the killing of its followers, despite being labelled a ‘Blood Merchant’ by India’s National Congress Party (the secularist party led by Gandhi’s family) over ten years ago.
[8] Ultimately the wicked world order regards the blood of Muslims to be worthless.
And from the impudence of this ‘elected’ murderer, is that when asked about the 2013 massacre he supported during his presidential campaign—a massacre that claimed the lives of over 2000 Muslims and displaced tens of thousands of others from Ahmedabad—he expressed that his sadness is similar to a back-seat passenger whose ride runs over a puppy!
[9]
If this is his abhorrent position regarding around 15% of India’s citizens (about 200 million Muslims), the grievances of the oppressed Muslims in India continuously fall upon deaf ears. Since his repugnant crimes were allowed unquestioned under his headship over one city, how will his racialist and hateful politics manifest now that he is the Prime Minister of India? All the while Obama shows his humiliating eagerness to meet him.
Translated from almoslim.com
Notes:
[3] http://edition.cnn.com/2014/05/16/politics/modi-us-visa/
[5] http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/narendra-modi-modi-as-pm-bjp-gujarat/1/309586.html
[6] http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/monde/20140404.OBS2715/
[7] http://www.risingkashmir.com/babri-masjid-demolition-monumental-shame-for-india/
[8] http://www.ianbirrell.com/divisive-extremist-with-blood-on-his-hands-or-saviour-of-his-state/
|
Sonia Gandhi Era
An Era of Darkness & of Immense Corruption
I can say without the shadow of a doubt that when history will be written, the period over which she (Sonia Gandhi) presided, both over the Congress and India , will be seen as an era of darkness, of immense corruption and of a democracy verging towards autocracy, if not disguised dictatorship, in the hands of a single person, a non Indian and a Christian like me. Truth will also come out about her being the main recipient for kickbacks from Bofors to 2G, which she uses to buy votes. Sir William "Mark" Tully, OBE (born 1935) is the former Bureau Chief of BBC, New Delhi. He worked for BBC for a period of 30 years before resigning in July 1994. He held the position of Chief of Bureau, BBC, Delhi for 20 years.[3] He has received awards and he has also written books. Tully was made an Officer of the Order of the British Empire in 1985 and was awarded thePadma Shree in 1992. He was knighted in the New Year Honours 2002, receiving a KBE, and in 2005 he received the Padma Bhushan. Sir William "Mark" Tully, OBE, Padma Shree, KBE, Padma Bhushan, one of the most respected journalists in the world, writes on Indian Politics:
THE TRUTH & THE HIDDEN FACTS I was surprised when the Congress party gave me a Padma Shri – I am the only foreign journalist to ever get it. For, in my forty years of political reporting in India , I have always been a vocal critic of the Nehru dynasty. Someone even called me recently: “a vitriolic British journalist, who in his old age chose to live back in the land he never approved”. It started with Operation Blue Star. I was one of the few western correspondents who criticized Indira. As I have said since then numerous times, the attack on the Golden Temple and the atrocities that followed the army operations, produced in all sections of the Sikhs a sense of outrage that is hard today to alleviate. I believed then that the large majority of Hindu India , even if politically hostile to Indira Gandhi, openly identified with – and exulted in – her will to overwhelmingly humble a recalcitrant minority. As everybody knows, Indira Gandhi helped my fame grow even more, by wanting to imprison me during the Emergency she clamped and finally throwing me out of India for a short while. But the result was that the whole of India tuned in, then and thereafter, to my radio’s broadcasts, ‘The Voice of India ’, to hear what they thought was ‘accurate’ coverage of events. When Rajiv Gandhi came to power, I first believed that he was sincerely trying to change the political system, but he quickly gave-up when the old guard would not budge. I criticized him for his foolish adventure in Sri Lanka , although I felt sorry for him when he was blown to pieces by Dhanu, the Tamil Tiger. It is in Kashmir , though that I fought most viciously against his Govt and subsequent Congress ones for its human right abuses on the Kashmiri Muslims of the Valley. The Congress Governments tried indeed several times to censor me and the army even took prisoner my Kashmiri stringer, whom I had to rescue by the skin of his teeth. I am also proud that I was the first one to point out then, that the Indian Government had at that time no proof of the Pakistani involvement in the freedom movement in Kashmir . Thus I always made it a point to start my broadcasts by proclaiming that « the Indian Government accuses Pakistan of fostering terrorism», or that “elections are being held in Indian-controlled Kashmir ”… As I was so popular, all the other foreign journalists used the same parlance to cover Kashmir and they always spoke of the plight of the Muslims, never of the 400.000 Hindus, who after all were chased out of their ancestral land by sheer terror (I also kept mum about it). As for Sonia Gandhi, I did not mind her, when she was Rajiv Gandhi’s wife, but after his death, I watched with dismay as she started stamping her authority on the Congress, which made me say in a series of broadcasts on the Nehru Dynasty: “It’s sad that the Indian National Congress should be completely dependent on one family; the total surrender of a national party to one person is deplorable. You have to ask the question: what claims does Sonia Gandhi have to justify her candidature for prime-ministership? Running a country is far more complicated than running a company. Apprenticeship is required in any profession — more so in politics”. I heard that Sonia Gandhi was unhappy about this broadcast. Then, after President APJ Abdul Kalam called her to the Raj Bhavan and told her what some of us already knew, namely that for a long time, she had kept both her Italian and Indian passports, which disqualified her to become the Prime Minister of India, she nevertheless became the Supreme leader of India behind the scenes. It is then that I exclaimed: “the moribund and leaderless Congress party has latched onto Sonia Gandhi, who is Italian by birth and Roman Catholic by baptism”. She never forgave me for that. Yet, today I can say without the shadow of a doubt that when history will be written, the period over which she presided, both over the Congress and India, will be seen as an era of darkness, of immense corruption and of a democracy verging towards autocracy, if not disguised dictatorship, in the hands of a single person, a non Indian and a Christian like me. Truth will also come out about her being the main recipient for kickbacks from Bofors to 2G, which she uses to buy votes, as the Wikileaks have just shown. Finally, I am sometimes flabbergasted at the fact that Indians –Hindus, sorry, as most of this country’s intelligentsia is Hindu – seem to love me so much, considering the fact that in my heydays, I considerably ran down the 850 million Hindus of this country, one billion worldwide. I have repented today: I do profoundly believe that India needs to be able to say with pride, “Yes, our civilization has a Hindu base to it.” The genius of Hinduism, the very reason it has survived so long, is that it does not stand up and fight. It changes and adapts and modernizes and absorbs–that is the scientific and proper way of going about it. I believe that Hinduism may actually prove to be the religion of this millennium, because it can adapt itself to change. Hindus are still slaves to MUSLIMS and CHRISTIANS On the name of secularism, lots of facilities and cash incentives are given to Muslims and Christians. Haj subsidy is given to Muslims for Haj yatra, wages of Muslim teachers and Imams are given to Muslims are given by looting the Hindu temples. No such subsidy is given to Hindus for going to Hindu religious places or any wages to Hindu religious priests or Hindu teachers. In fact congress secular government creates many obstacles for Hindus for going to Amarnath Yatra. Even after 65 years of independence reservation is given on religious grounds while it should have been abolished by this time. If at all reservation or subsidy is needed, then it should be purely on economic grounds rather on the grounds of minorities. Such reservations affect the quality of work. Congress party giving various kinds of allurements to minorities to buy their votes with Hindu money. In the government many people are with Hindu names but in fact many are Muslims and Christians with Hindu names (**) to fool Hindus and to show in the government, majority people are Hindus.------------------------------ |