日本イスラーム研究所 Japan Islamic Research Institute


 

ANTI-MUSLIM RECORD OF MODI  

 

"Ultimately the wicked world order regards the blood of Muslims to be worthless."

  

Narendra Modi is the very same terrorist who led the Hinadak gangs’ destruction of the historic Babri Mosque in the city of Ayodhya in 1992, constructing a Hindu temple on its ruins.

 
  "Recently CNN concluded its news report on the new Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, describing him as “anti-Muslim”" 

Modi was actually barred from entering the United States from 2005-2014 (until now) due to the charges held against him for his crimes and atrocities against the Muslims of his own nation; crimes which CNN and most major Western media outlets have argued were sanctioned by the state as Muslims were turned into refugees in their own homes."

 
The rise and rise of Narendra Modi
Rakesh Chandra  New Delhi, September 13, 2013 | UPDATED 11:41 IST
 
Born in September, 1950 at Vadnagar, a small town in Mehsana district of North Gujarat, Shri Narendra Modi grew up in a culture that instilled in him the values of generosity, benevolence and social service. During the India-Pak war in the mid sixties, even as a young boy, he volunteered to serve the soldiers in transit at railway stations. In 1967, he served the flood affected people of Gujarat. Endowed with excellent organisational capability and a rich insight into human psychology, he served in Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) and played a prominent role in various socio-political movements in Gujarat.

Modi wins record third term in Gujarat, bolsters PM prospects and heads to north India, living with sadhus -- or holy men -- for months before returning to Gujarat in the late 1960s to serve steaming cups of tea alongside one of his brothers at a stall in Ahmedabad.

1987: Modi joins the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in 1987 as the 7-year-old party becomes more popular and taps into the growth of Hindu nationalism across India. The party wins a majority in Gujarat in 1995 and Modi rises quickly up the ranks.Just within a year, he was elevated to the level of General Secretary of the Gujarat unit.

Between 1988 and 1995, Narendra Modi was recognized as a master strategist who had successfully gained the necessary groundwork for making the Gujarat BJP the ruling party of the state.

He took up the challenging task of energising the party cadres in right earnest. The party started gaining political mileage and formed a coalition government at the centre in April 1990. This partnership fell apart within a few months, but the BJP came to power with a two-thirds majority on its own in Gujarat in 1995. Since then, the BJP has been governing Gujarat.

In 1995
, he was appointed the National Secretary of the party and given the charge of five major states in India - a rare distinction for a young leader. In 1998, he was promoted as the General Secretary (Organization), a post he held until October 2001, when he was chosen to be the Chief Minister of Gujarat,

In October 2001, he was called upon by the party to lead the Government in Gujarat. When Shri Modi 's government was sworn in on October 7, 2001, the economy of Gujarat was reeling under the adverse effects of several natural calamities, including a massive earthquake in January 2001. The biggest challenge that he had to face,

2001: Modi gets his big break when Keshubhai Patel, the former chief minister of Gujarat, is forced to step down in the fallout from the January earthquake that killed around 20,000 people. He is selected as Patel's replacement and remained in power ever since, becoming Gujarat's longest-serving chief minister.

February 27, 2002: Riots break out after over 50 Hindu pilgrims die in a train fire in the town of Godhra. Between 1,000 to 2,000 people, mainly Muslims, are killed, and Modi, as chief minister, is accused by his critics of not doing enough to stem the riots and even quietly encouraging them -- allegations he has strongly denied and which have never been proved. To this day, the riots haunt Modi's government. In 2012, one of Modi's former ministers, Maya Kodnani, is sentenced to 28 years in jail alongside 30 others for the violence.

2005: Modi was denied a visa to travel to the United States for alleged violation of religious freedom, causing uproar in India.

2007:  Elected Gujarat chief minister for the third time (117 seats).

October 2008: Modi persuades Tata Motors to move its factory to build its ultra-low cost Nano car to Gujarat from West Bengal after protests from farmers over land compensation, a sign of his business-friendly approach to politics. Gujarat today is one of India's wealthiest states and Modi's supporters credit him for bringing uninterrupted power supplies, smooth roads and a flood of investment to the state.

2011:  Modi undertakes the Sadbhavana Yatra, a roadshow throughout Gujarat ostensibly to promote social harmony., when his ambitions for prime ministership first became public,

March 2012: In its issue dated 26th March 2012 TIME, one of the world's leading news magazines had Shri Narendra Modi on its cover page with a story titled 'Modi Means Business'.

August 31, 2012: Modi addresses a number of topics during an online web cam chat which draws questions from around India and across the world. Viewed as a media-savvy politician, the 62-year-old is also an avid Twitter user with more than a million followers.

Narendra Modi completed record 4000 days in service of the people of Gujarat on 17th September 2012.

September 2012: The Vivekananda Yuva Vikas Yatra, ostensibly to campaign for the approaching Assembly elections, though Modi's speeches focused on Centre vs state issues and Prime Minister
Manmohan Singh.

October 22, 2012: British High Commissioner James Bevan sits down with Modi to discuss business and investment in a landmark meeting that ends the UK's 10-year diplomatic boycott imposed on him for failing to stop the Gujarat riots.
 
December 13, 2012: Modi seeks to win a fourth term as chief minister of Gujarat. Results from the two-stage vote will be published on December 20. For the first time during campaigning in India, Modi uses 3-D projections of himself to appear "live" on stage at simultaneous events. Opinion polls indicate Modi will cruise to another victory.

After leading the party to victory in 2002 and 2007 (117 seats) elections, Shri Modi led the BJP to another victory at the hustings during the 2012 Gujarat Assembly Elections. The BJP emerged victorious in 115 seats and Shri Modi was sworn-in as the CM of Gujarat for the 4th consecutive time on 26th December 2012.

June 9, 2013
:Modi was chosen to head the BJP's campaign in general elections due in 2014, a position that could make him the party's candidate for prime minister. A day later, rival leader Lal Krishna Advani resigns from BJP posts, exposing deep rifts in the party, However, he later withdrew the resignation on the intervention of the RSS..

June 16, 2013
:Nitish Kumar, head of the Janata Dal (United), pulls out of a 17-year-old alliance with the BJP after the party's decision to anoint Modi as its standard-bearer for the general elections.
 

Posted by: Ahmad Chaker Jomaa 

(Translated from Arabic)

 

According to a statement issued by the U.S. State Department on May 16th 2014, the United States has welcomed the success of the new

 
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, stating that U.S President Barack Obama will work to establish close communication with him when he composes his government and assumes the responsibilities of his office.

 

[1] The US will work with the formed parliament and strengthen bilateral relations between the two countries.

[2]

Recently CNN concluded its news report on the new Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, describing him as “anti-Muslim”

[3] being the leader of one of the most malicious Hindu extremist groups. In the seventies Modi emerged as a supporter of the ‘Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh’ or RSS, a right wing Hindu social movement.

[4] In 1988, the RSS party transferred Modi to the ‘Bharatiya Janata Party’ or BJP and Modi assumed Secretary-General of BJP in the city of Gujarat. In 2001 Modi was elected as Chief Minister of Gujarat.

[5] Riots broke out in the following year between Hindus and Muslims in the city, claiming the lives of over a thousand people, most of whom were Muslims. Modi was severely criticised and accused of neglecting his duty of halting the riots. However, following an investigation in 2013, the High Court of Justice declared him innocent of all charges.

French newspaper ‘Le Nouvel Observateur’ is seldom considered partial in favour of Islam or Muslims. Nonetheless, following an on-the-ground investigation it documented Modi’s crimes (‘the Ascension of Terrible Modi’).

[6] Regrettably, some in the West—as we can expect—only pay heed to reports that suit their whims and more than often fail to recognise accounts that do not serve their hostility towards Islam and Muslims. While he may have shed crocodile tears over the riots, Modi refuses to utter a single word of apology for the brutality that transpired, while meanwhile commentators confirm that “Modi represents death to Muslims.”

Narendra Modi is the very same terrorist who led the Hinadak gangs’ destruction of the historic Babri Mosque in the city of Ayodhya in 1992, constructing a Hindu temple on its ruins.

[7]

The twisted irony is that a man with such a disgraceful record is being welcomed so eagerly by the biggest peddles of ‘democracy’ in the world. This is in spite of the fact that Modi was actually barred from entering the United States from 2005-2014 (until now) due to the charges held against him for his crimes and atrocities against the Muslims of his own nation; crimes which CNN and most major Western media outlets have argued were sanctioned by the state as Muslims were turned into refugees in their own homes.

The West’s position has turned on its head, with Obama extending an invitation to this criminal to visit the US even before he officially took office, instructing his ambassador to India to congratulate Modi immediately after the results were announced.

Strangely enough people celebrate the victory of a man who possesses the ‘necessary qualifications’ of hatred against Islam and the killing of its followers, despite being labelled a ‘Blood Merchant’ by India’s National Congress Party (the secularist party led by Gandhi’s family) over ten years ago.

[8] Ultimately the wicked world order regards the blood of Muslims to be worthless.

And from the impudence of this ‘elected’ murderer, is that when asked about the 2013 massacre he supported during his presidential campaign—a massacre that claimed the lives of over 2000 Muslims and displaced tens of thousands of others from Ahmedabad—he expressed that his sadness is similar to a back-seat passenger whose ride runs over a puppy!

[9]

If this is his abhorrent position regarding around 15% of India’s citizens (about 200 million Muslims), the grievances of the oppressed Muslims in India continuously fall upon deaf ears. Since his repugnant crimes were allowed unquestioned under his headship over one city, how will his racialist and hateful politics manifest now that he is the Prime Minister of India? All the while Obama shows his humiliating eagerness to meet him.

 

Translated from almoslim.com

Notes:

[1] http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/world/looking-forward-to-welcome-modi-to-us-kerry/article6055877.ece

[2] http://www.mathrubhumi.com/english/news/world/obama-vows-to-work-with-modi-for-years-to-come-146862.html

[3] http://edition.cnn.com/2014/05/16/politics/modi-us-visa/

[4] http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-19/hindu-campaigners-backing-modi-risk-spooking-needed-india-allies.html

[5] http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/narendra-modi-modi-as-pm-bjp-gujarat/1/309586.html

[6] http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/monde/20140404.OBS2715/

[7] http://www.risingkashmir.com/babri-masjid-demolition-monumental-shame-for-india/

[8] http://www.ianbirrell.com/divisive-extremist-with-blood-on-his-hands-or-saviour-of-his-state/

[9] http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21600106-he-will-probably-become-indias-next-prime-minister-does-not-mean-he-should-be-can-anyone

 

Sonia Gandhi Era

 
 An Era of Darkness & of Immense Corruption

 

I can say without the shadow of a doubt that when history will be written, the period over which she (Sonia Gandhi) presided, both over the Congress and India , will be seen as an era of darkness, of immense corruption and of a democracy verging towards autocracy, if not disguised dictatorship, in the hands of a single person, a non Indian and a Christian like me. Truth will also come out about her being the main recipient for kickbacks from Bofors to 2G, which she uses to buy votes.

 Sir William "Mark" Tully, OBE (born 1935) is the former Bureau Chief of BBCNew Delhi. He worked for BBC for a period of 30 years before resigning in July 1994. He held the position of Chief of Bureau, BBC, Delhi for 20 years.[3] He has received awards and he has also written books.

Tully was made an Officer of the Order of the British Empire in 1985 and was awarded thePadma Shree in 1992. He was knighted in the New Year Honours 2002, receiving a KBE, and in 2005 he received the Padma Bhushan.

Sir William "Mark" Tully, OBE, Padma Shree, KBE, Padma Bhushan, one of the most respected journalists in the world, writes on Indian Politics:

An eye opener account, not known to most of the Indians.

THE TRUTH & THE HIDDEN FACTS

 I was surprised when the Congress party gave me a Padma Shri – I am the only foreign journalist to ever get it. For, in my forty years of political reporting in India , I have always been a vocal critic of the Nehru dynasty. Someone even called me recently: “a vitriolic British journalist, who in his old age chose to live back in the land he never approved”.

 It started with Operation Blue Star. I was one of the few western correspondents who criticized Indira. As I have said since then numerous times, the attack on the Golden Temple and the atrocities that followed the army operations, produced in all sections of the Sikhs a sense of outrage that is hard today to alleviate. I believed then that the large majority of Hindu India , even if politically hostile to Indira Gandhi, openly identified with – and exulted in – her will to overwhelmingly humble a recalcitrant minority.

As everybody knows, Indira Gandhi helped my fame grow even more, by wanting to imprison me during the Emergency she clamped and finally throwing me out of India for a short while. But the result was that the whole of India tuned in, then and thereafter, to my radio’s broadcasts, ‘The Voice of India ’, to hear what they thought was ‘accurate’ coverage of events.

When Rajiv Gandhi came to power, I first believed that he was sincerely trying to change the political system, but he quickly gave-up when the old guard would not budge. I criticized him for his foolish adventure in Sri Lanka , although I felt sorry for him when he was blown to pieces by Dhanu, the Tamil Tiger. It is in Kashmir , though that I fought most viciously against his Govt and subsequent Congress ones for its human right abuses on the Kashmiri Muslims of the Valley. The Congress Governments tried indeed several times to censor me and the army even took prisoner my Kashmiri stringer, whom I had to rescue by the skin of his teeth. I am also proud that I was the first one to point out then, that the Indian Government had at that time no proof of the Pakistani involvement in the freedom movement in Kashmir . Thus I always made it a point to start my broadcasts by proclaiming that « the Indian Government accuses Pakistan of fostering terrorism», or that “elections are being held in Indian-controlled  Kashmir ”…

 As I was so popular, all the other foreign journalists used the same parlance to cover Kashmir and they always spoke of the plight of the Muslims, never of the 400.000 Hindus, who after all were chased out of their ancestral land by sheer terror (I also kept mum about it).

 As for Sonia Gandhi, I did not mind her, when she was Rajiv Gandhi’s wife, but after his death, I watched with dismay as she started stamping her authority on the Congress, which made me say in a series of broadcasts on the Nehru Dynasty: “It’s sad that the Indian National Congress should be completely dependent on one family; the total surrender of a national party to one person is deplorable. You have to ask the question: what claims does Sonia Gandhi have to justify her candidature for prime-ministership? Running a country is far more complicated than running a company. Apprenticeship is required in any profession — more so in politics”. I heard that Sonia Gandhi was unhappy about this broadcast.

 Then, after President APJ Abdul Kalam called her to the Raj Bhavan and told her what some of us already knew, namely that for a long time, she had kept both her Italian and Indian passports, which disqualified her to become the Prime Minister of India, she nevertheless became the Supreme leader of India behind the scenes. It is then that I exclaimed: “the moribund and leaderless Congress party has latched onto Sonia Gandhi, who is Italian by birth and Roman Catholic by baptism”.

She never forgave me for that. Yet, today I can say without the shadow of a doubt that when history will be written, the period over which she presided, both over the Congress and India, will be seen as an era of darkness, of immense corruption and of a democracy verging towards autocracy, if not disguised dictatorship, in the hands of a single person, a non Indian and a Christian like me. Truth will also come out about her being the main recipient for kickbacks from Bofors to 2G, which she uses to buy votes, as the Wikileaks have just shown.

Finally, I am sometimes flabbergasted at the fact that Indians –Hindus, sorry, as most of this country’s intelligentsia is Hindu – seem to love me so much, considering the fact that in my heydays, I considerably ran down the 850 million Hindus of this country, one billion worldwide. I have repented today: I do profoundly believe that India needs to be able to say with pride, “Yes, our civilization has a Hindu base to it.”

The genius of Hinduism, the very reason it has survived so long, is that it does not stand up and fight. It changes and adapts and modernizes and absorbs–that is the scientific and proper way of going about it. I believe that Hinduism may actually prove to be the religion of this millennium, because it can adapt itself to change.

 Hindus are still slaves to MUSLIMS and CHRISTIANS

 On the name of secularism, lots of facilities and cash incentives are given to Muslims and Christians. Haj subsidy is given to Muslims for Haj yatra, wages of Muslim teachers and Imams are given to Muslims are given by looting the Hindu temples. No such subsidy is given to Hindus for going to Hindu religious places or any wages to Hindu religious priests or Hindu teachers. In fact congress secular government creates many obstacles for Hindus for going to Amarnath Yatra. Even after 65 years of independence reservation is given on religious grounds while it should have been abolished by this time. If at all reservation or subsidy is needed, then it should be purely on economic grounds rather on the grounds of minorities. Such reservations affect the quality of work. Congress party giving various kinds of allurements to minorities to buy their votes with Hindu money. In the government many people are with Hindu names but in fact many are Muslims and Christians with Hindu names (**) to fool Hindus and to show in the government, majority people are Hindus.------------------------------